I just watched the Democratic National Convention the other night (luckily my husband recorded it or else I would have missed it!) and when Bill Clinton came on, I knew I was in for a good time. He is such an amazing orator. Unless he used a teleprompter, I do not think he was reading from any notes. His speech was so empowering. His words flowed so smoothly and eloquently. I believe he was quite persuasive in his speech. The crowd also seemed to feel the same way as they cheered through most of his speech. His arguments were very convincing and he had thorough knowledge on the topics he discussed. I believe Clinton's credibility helps him in his speeches. Of course, for his past indiscretions, many people often scoff when he is mentioned, but as a leader of our country for eight years, he accomplished many amazing tasks that no other president before him had done (granted, most were not put in the position Clinton faced when he assumed office, but that's beside the point). Clinton of course was a very powerful man when he held office and I believe he still is. He is linked to his wife, Hillary, who is a very influential and powerful woman, so I do believe Clinton's power of authority does him well when he speaks. I think Clinton possesses all three traits discussed for this post. He of course is attractive for an older man. His accent is also not so bad to the ears either. When Clinton speaks, at least for the democats, his words are heard and his words are his vow, he does not stand behind something he doesn't support or believe in and I feel that is also what makes him an influential speaker.
Kate
I think that Bill Clinton is one the best Presidential public speakers since Ronald Regan. His demeanor is one who is in control, well informed, and connected with the audience. His persona is helped by Hillary Clinton’s high profile position.
ReplyDeleteI did not vote for him nor did I like some of his policies, but always thought he was a good politician. His ability to connect with the American people and polished style are his hallmarks.
If he had not had his marital infidelity he would have been better respected on the other side of the political isle. It is not a judgment of his leadership but of his character as a man and yes that matters.